On 07/26/2014 04:29 AM, jim deleskie wrote:
Rich,
In principal I agree, and I've said this many times, for years I've telecommuted myself, mostly effectively. I'd work much longer hours, but not always worked as efficiently during all of those hours. When I started my own company, with $$ be in short supply like all start ups I I planned to have as many folks telecommute as possible. In some cases it worked out, in others it was a terrible failure. Maybe it was my hiring choices, maybe it was being a bad "manager" but without people in the office it was harder to tell. Also with "most" people under one roof now, I also see the on going information sharing that isn't as possible with a mostly remote office.
Having done about every conceivable combination, I think the sweet spot is, unsurprisingly, somewhere in between. Telecommuting is great if you need a lot of undisturbed time, but it's horrible if you need interaction with coworkers. So for me, at least (primarily a dev type) having an intersection in the middle of the day a couple days a week at least is the best balance. That said, I think that part of this might be solved with technology somehow. A big problem, IMO, is that we use tech much too formally in that meetings get scheduled instead of just interrupting somebody at their desk which often blows things way out of proportion to their actual import, and worse delays resolving issues. Maybe the webrtc stuff will help this by making ad hoc communication trivial and pervasive and wrest it from the hands of these bloated, overwrought conferencing-as-business-model abominations we have to deal with. Mike