11 Jul
2006
11 Jul
'06
6:14 p.m.
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, WONG, Yuen-Fung wrote:
Sometimes earlier this year someone announced this 128/1 and caused heavy loading to our routers to rebuild the CEF. Would anyone filter out this route (and other similar routes such as 0/1, 128/1, 0/2, 64/2, .... up to /4, for example) as bogus routes?
Do you not prefix-list customers? That'd have solved this, eh?