Now if only T-Mobile would launch IPv6 for I-Devices!! No, blaming Apple for not implementing your chosen transition mechanism is not a valid excuse. Owen
On Apr 13, 2015, at 2:20 PM, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
Good news (that i have not personally verified) !
Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint, and AT&T all launched the Samsung Galaxy S6 with IPv6 on by default.
Given the growth and importance of mobile to Internet, it is great to see this progress from the mobile carriers.
Just for those keeping score, of the top 10 Alexa website for the USA, these major websites prefer IPv6 or prefer NAT44 / NAT64 from the mobile networks
1. Google -- prefers IPv6 2. Facebook -- prefers IPv6 3. Youtube -- prefers IPv6 4. Amazon -- prefers NAT -- :( 5. Yahoo! -- prefers IPv6 6. Wikipedia -- prefers IPv6 7. Twitter -- prefers NAT -- :( 8. Ebay -- prefers NAT -- :( 9. Linkedin -- prefers IPv6 10. Reddit -- prefers NAT -- :(
Dear Amazon, Twitter, Ebay, and Reddit -- please consider this your personal invitation to introduce IPv6 to your service.