22 Apr
2010
22 Apr
'10
7:52 a.m.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 07:46:50AM -0400, William Herrin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 7:30 AM, <bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com> wrote:
On the other hand, I could swear I've seen a draft where the PC picks up random unused addresses in the lower 64 for each new outbound connection for anonymity purposes. Even if there is no such draft, it wouldn't exactly be hard to implement. It won't take NAT to anonymize the PCs on a LAN with IPv6.
the idea is covered by one or more patents held by cisco.
Won't stop the worms from using it to hide which PC they're living on.
no... but then you just block the /32 and your fine... :) kind of like how people now block /8s for ranges that are "messy" --bill