Nobody needs to worry. I promise to reserve the last /32 out of my /29 assignment. When the world has run out of addresses, I will start to sell from my pool using the same allocation policy that was used for IPv4. I would consider a /64 to be equal a /32 IPv4 address. This would make a /56 assignment equal to a /24 IPv4 minimum assignment. Historically we spent about 3 decades before running out of IPv4 space. So my scheme should be good enough for some additional decades of IPv6. I just hope nobody else does the same. That would be bad for my business case. Regards Baldur Den 30. dec. 2017 02.11 skrev "Scott Weeks" <surfer@mauigateway.com>:
--- jlightfoot@gmail.com wrote: From: John Lightfoot <jlightfoot@gmail.com>
Excuse the top post, but this seems to be an argument between people who understand big numbers and those who don't. ------------------------------------
No, not exactly. It's also about those that think in current/past network terms and those who are saying we don't know what the future holds, so we should be careful.
----------------------------- which means 79 octillion people...no one alive will be around -----------------------------
Stop thinking in terms of people. Think in terms of huge numbers of 'things' in the ocean, in the atmosphere, in space, zillions of 'things' on and around everyone's bodies and homes and myriad other 'things' we can't even imagine right now.
scott