Anyone ever try using the RADWARE LinkProof ? (or similar - are there any others ? ) <http://www.radware.com/content/products/link.htm> It looks like a combination between link monitoring & NAT'ing internal address the the "best" ISP's NetBlock Thanks - Rafi -- Rafi Sadowsky rafi@noc.ilan.net.il Network Operations Center | VoiceMail: +972-3-646-0592 FAX: +972-3-646-0454 ILAN - IUCC -I2(Israel) | FIRST-REP ILAN-CERT(CERT@CERT.AC.IL) (Israeli Academic Network) | (PGP key -> ) http://telem.openu.ac.il/~rafi On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Vadim Antonov wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, E.B. Dreger wrote:
Meanwhile, the problem is that the demand to do fancy routing things outstrips the Internet's current collective ability to supply it. As a result, we have to say "no" (or more $ than you can afford) to alot of things that seem worthwhile. One of
Yes. Put bluntly, technology is not serving its users. It's the oil-burning '73 Nova that won't die: far from ideal, but it still runs, so we may as well use it instead of buying a new car...
I would really love to hear if anyone invented a way to do global routing with anything better than combination of flooding of aggregated reacheability information and defaut routes.
It is not technology per se, it's the underlying concept which is barely adequate.
--vadim
PS I too have a pair of diverse DSLs and use combination of DNS (for ingress) and hash-based load sharing (for egress) packet routing. The resulting paths are sometimes hugely far from optimal.