Dear BZS: 1) " ... it was more likely due to the success of CGNAT.": Looking forward from this milestone marker, what would you envision as the possible additions to CG-NAT's characteristics and capabilities for the potential expansion of its services and enhancement to its performances? Thanks, Abe (2023-01-16 10:22) On 2023-01-11 19:33, bzs@theworld.com wrote:
On January 12, 2023 at 02:11noah@neo.co.tz (Noah) wrote:
Hi John,
So, It was assumed that IPv4 depletion would effectively lead to the adoption of IPv6. This has not been the case in the last decade save for a very few countries in the world.
It was also assumed that IPv6 only networks would crop all over the place as a result, providing the same interconnectivity benefits enjoyed by the IPv4 internet.
Out of curiosity,did the emergency of transfer markets slow IPNG adoption while creating prolonged dependence on IPv4?
Probably ten people have said this already but it was more likely due to the success of CGNAT.
-- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com