RE: slack.com

Friday is always a good day to do such change. :D -----Original Message----- From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+jean=ddostest.me@nanog.org> On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: October 2, 2021 2:17 AM To: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: slack.com On 10/2/21 08:14, Bill Woodcock wrote:

We did not use an NTA, but we did flush our cache immediately once Slack had fixed their problem. I think that’s the right balance of carrot and stick.

Tend to agree with this approach. But I can see how an issue like this could be potentially religious. DNSSEC deployment rate is bad enough, as it is. Mark.