On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 07:31:24AM -0400, Stephen Griffin wrote:
In the referenced message, Gary E. Miller said:
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Stephen Griffin wrote:
So, if people picked better providers, they wouldn't need to multihome. You feel you need to multihome, because you keep picking DSL, which just isn't a good choce for "mission critical applications".
PSI could be next. They are not DSL. If I still had a PSInet connection I would sure want it multihomed.
I don't see how this changes anything. DSL is a subset of the "not good" variety, not the complete set. If I had "mission critical applications" I would probably include companies that are likely to file for Chapter 7 or Chapter 11 in the "not good" variety.
umm, perhaps you might have a better term than just "DSL". it's pretty common to supply DS1 circuits over HDSL lines now-a-days. so, one of our T1's looks identical (even to the bumbling ILEC "technicians") to two $40/month residential DSL lines. up to the DSLAM and beyond, i would assume... -- Henry Yen Aegis Information Systems, Inc. Senior Systems Programmer Hicksville, New York