At 02:59 PM 10/24/2002, Kelly J. Cooper wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 18:01:44 -0000, "Kelly J. Cooper" <kcooper@genuity.net> said:
So, seven years of hardening hosts against SYN attacks. Five years of trying to get people to turn off the forwarding of broadcast packets. Three years of botnets generating meg upon meg of crap-bandwidth.
Where are the suuuuuper-geniuses?
You know, most bars have bouncers at the door that check IDs. Sure, they're not perfect, but the bartender can usually be pretty sure the guy ordering a beer is over 21. The average bar isn't run by a soooper-genius. But it's still considered fashionable to let packets roam your network without an ID check at the door.
Yeah and how's that working so far?
The Bouncer/Bartender who serve an underage person are subject to prosecution, and are liable if someone gets drunk and goes driving and gets into trouble. We've had BCPs in place for some time on directed broadcast and ingress issues. I expect it will take lawsuits to get many people to get serious about implementing these. While it's up to lawyers and judges to decide if ignoring an industry Best Current Practice opens a company to negligence, I won't be surprised if I'm asked to testify for a prosecution in such a case.