-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 (catching up) On 2004-11-22, at 18.52, Paul Vixie wrote:
none of those three things is acceptable, not even as a compromise.
The current solution I see for this is still IPv6. Except that one moves the complete 'Independence' problem a layer higher. Enter:
HIP: Host Identity Protocol: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/hip-charter.html
this level of complexity seems a little high for anything to be universal. (let me put it this way: A6/DNAME was shot down because of complexity, and it was simpler than this.)
I am not convinced A6/DNAME would have solved all problems, not even all of the ones you pointed out. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQancTKarNKXTPFCVEQJ22QCfQ32v6oWBDVe9t2CVRT1vuc0BtggAoMbz xpInNhcRVCGIMdkm5GX40ozj =s5iV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----