Something wrong with this?
sho ip bgp 137.39.0.0 255.255.0.0 BGP routing table entry for 137.39.0.0/16, version 533944 Paths: (2 available, best #2, advertised over IBGP) 174 192.41.177.245 from 192.41.177.245 Origin IGP, metric 30, localpref 100, valid, external Community: 2548:668 701 198.32.186.248 from 198.32.186.248 (137.39.3.57) Origin IGP, metric 2, localpref 100, valid, external, best Community: 2548:668
*174*?
What's really criminal is that neither of them have NOCs.
From private mail I received, it is clear that I was being too subtle.
UUNET and PSI have perfectly fine NOCs. The problem was that Jamie seems not to know how to use them and posts to nanog in stead. Folk, it is no longer safe to assume that clueful folk from provider X read this list. They have been driven off by the noise. Some weeks back, folk on a private list asked for anyone who still read nanog to copy over any useful message. None have been copied. This one certainly won't be. :-) randy PS: This is an actual bug. I do not think PSI has bought UUNET.