On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 04:07:52PM -0500, Geoff Huston wrote:
On 12 Feb 2024, at 3:14 pm, Job Snijders via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote: At NANOG 90, Merit presented on their IRRd v4 deployment. At the microphone Geoff Huston raised a comment which I interpreted as:
[snip]
no - I was making an observation that the presentation material was referring to "RPKI-Invalid" while their implementation was using "ROA-Invalid" There is a difference between these two terms, as I'm sure you're aware.
Thanks for the clarification! I guess I somehow got very confused watching the webstream as to what your comment or ask was. In any regard, - researchers, please just talk to IRRD operators if your experiment requires the existence of RPKI/ROA-invalid route/route6 objects! There are ways to make it happen, but the default of course is to keep things as tidy as possible :-) Greetings from the Netherlands & sorry to miss N90, Job