3 Dec
2003
3 Dec
'03
8:34 p.m.
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 09:53:37AM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 09:48:44AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
How can delegating in-addr.arpa on a per-ip basis be any different or worse than delegating it using an rfc2317 scheme?
consider the label of the ns rr to delegate only 1.2.3.42
Do you mean ns.42.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa? I still don't see what's wrong with the following, or how it leads to cache poisoning or leaky name space.
42.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa IN NS ns.42.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa. ns.42.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa IN A 5.6.7.86
Eight hours later, and I'm still waiting for a reply on this. Were the original attacks by Pete Ehlke warranted, or would he care to retract his statements? --Adam