On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 11:36:55PM -0700, brett watson wrote:
On Thursday, May 1, 2003, at 23:27 America/Phoenix, Sean Donelan wrote:
Back to the original question Chris Morrow asked a long time ago. What should be considered acceptable proof?
If Paul Vixie showed up on my doorstep tomorrow, and asked me to route 192.5.5.0; what proof should I accept from him (or anyone) to demostrate beyond a reasonable doubt he has the authority to route a particular network?
oh! i know! because i know paul, and will personally vouch for him?
To which the response is usually something like: "Then you are obviously a co-conspirator, and we will now begin investigating your involvement. Please provide all of your information and justify everything you are doing, before we post everything we can find on you to a mailing list or newsgroup." -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)