In message <B2100B46-6D93-46A2-8746-5CFB8BE88AE9@bogus.com>, Joel Jaeggli write s:
On May 23, 2011, at 10:36 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On May 23, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Mark Farina wrote:
Is the DoD releasing this range to Rogers? =20 Unlikely, although it might be an interesting case of testing ARIN's =
=20
Or has Rogers squatted on this space due to exhaustion of their 10/8 = use? =20 =20 More likely they are making the assumption that their private internal = use of the address space won't conflict with DoD's (apparently) private internal use of =
=20 =20 Sent from my iPad =20 On May 23, 2011, at 11:32, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote: =20 transfer policy if it was the case :-). the address space.
if they're numbering cpe out of it they've also decided that breaking = 6to4 is no problem either, if they aren't then hey it's just more ipv4 = ugliness, and there's alot more where that came from...
joel=
and other stuff which doesn't work in a double nat environment. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org