On May 12, 2011, at 9:06 AM, Scott Whyte wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 23:10, Franck Martin <fmartin@linkedin.com> wrote:
I think the yahoo test should just differentiate between no IPv6 and IPv6 is slow (test between 3s and 10s). Like:
We have detected that you have IPv6 and will be able to access our site on IPv6 day, but your user experience may not be as good as with IPv4, you may consider disabling IPv6.
Measurements during the experiment won't be directly comparable to those before/after, at least as far as I can see. So they will be informative, but its the slope of the brokenness line before/after that will determine when IPv6 is not an impediment to itself.
-Scott
I think it's a little more complex. I think there are two lines. A line representing brokenness with AAAA records enabled and a line representing brokenness without AAAA records. The first line is trending downwards while the second line is trending upwards and wil soon be making a rather pronounced increase in its slope. When these two lines cross, I think it will become virtually inevitable that those who are ready to do so will publish their AAAA records. Owen