Oh, I'm sure that'll never be abused by any hostile nation-state-owned monopoly telecom that likes to block/ban/MITM traffic, ever! On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 1:11 PM <lists@as23738.net> wrote:
IME ATT has intercepted virtually everything on mobile (this is on a hotspot) -
If I curl a HTTP vs HTTPS site, I get a different IP on each (one is obviously a shared web proxy); if I download images, they won't match md5-wise with the original version, etc. I have trouble connecting to VPNs that aren't standard SSL VPNs. They appear to MITM all web traffic they can. Using third party DNS servers has questionable results.
AT&Fee is also a key player in undermining http2 security with their “trusted proxy”
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-loreto-httpbis-trusted-proxy20-01
On Mon, May 21, 2018, at 12:35 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
I ran into an odd issue with access to a website I manage from AT&T mobile devices this weekend. The website worked for everybody not on AT&T mobile, and AT&T mobile users could access other sites; the
problem
was just this combination.
Android and iOS phones, as well as a Linux system tethered to an Android phone, all had the same problem. On the Linux system, I disabled IPv6 in Firefox, and it could then connect. Browsers got various "connection reset" type errors; on Linux, I could telnet to port 80 or 443, and it would connect and immediately close.
The site does have an IPv6 address, but I had missed getting the webserver to listen on IPv6 (my mistake). Adding that looks to have solved the problem.
When I ran tcpdump on the server and had someone try to connect from their AT&T mobile iPhone, I saw three connection attempts a few tenths of a second apart (all refused by the server).
My question is this: is AT&T mobile intercepting the TCP socket (and not handling "connection refused" correctly)? Is that a known thing?
-- Chris Adams <cma@cmadams.net>