zfs and ganeti -- Phones are not computers and suck for email On December 11, 2014 2:39:19 PM GMT+09:00, Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
We are now using ZFS RAIDZ and the question I ask myself is, why wasn't I using ZFS years ago?
because it is not production on linux,
Well, it depends on what you mean by "production". Certainly the ZFS on Linux group has said in some forums that it is "production ready", although I would say that their definition is not exactly the same as what I mean by the term.
which i have to use because freebsd does not have kvm/ganeti.
There is bhyve, and virt-manager can support bhyve in later versions (but is disabled by default as I recall). Not exactly the same, of course.
want zfs very very badly. snif.
Anyone who really cares about their data wants ZFS. Some just do not yet know that they (should) want it.
There is always Illumos/OnmiOS/SmartOS to consider (depending on your particular requirements) which can do ZFS and KVM.