Sent from my iPad

On Oct 3, 2019, at 12:14 PM, Stephen Satchell <list@satchell.net> wrote:

On 10/3/19 8:42 AM, Fred Baker wrote:


On Oct 3, 2019, at 9:51 AM, Stephen Satchell <list@satchell.net> wrote:

Someone else mentioned that "IPv6 has been around for 25 years, and why
is it taking so long for everyone to adopt it?"  I present as evidence
the lack of a formally-released requirements RFC for IPv6.  It suggests
that the "science" of IPv6 is not "settled" yet.  That puts the
deployment of IPv6 in the category of "experiment" and not "production".

And, of course, we now have companies like T-Mobile and others
turning IPv4 off. If that's an experiment, wow.
The cellular data industry appears to have embraced IPv6 in one form or
another.  I would expect that the network engineers have done some work
to keep IPv4 off their *internal* networks, but provide IPv4 access at
the edge.  (Isn't a netblock within IPv6 intended to enable bridging to
IPv4?)  The applications on the phon could be configured to search DNS
for AAAA addresses first.

T-Mobile documented what they are doing at https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6877.

My AT&T cell phone has both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.  The IPv4 address
is from my access point; the IPv6 address appears to be a public address.

So does my T-Mobile phone. It got the IPv4 address from my friendly neighborhood WiFi. 

I would like to move to IPv6.  I just don't want to shoot myself in the
foot, or cause trouble for other people, by being sure my edge router
"follows all the rules."