On Oct 3, 2019, at 12:14 PM, Stephen Satchell <list@satchell.net> wrote:
On 10/3/19 8:42 AM, Fred Baker wrote:On Oct 3, 2019, at 9:51 AM, Stephen Satchell <list@satchell.net> wrote:Someone else mentioned that "IPv6 has been around for 25 years, and whyis it taking so long for everyone to adopt it?" I present as evidencethe lack of a formally-released requirements RFC for IPv6. It suggeststhat the "science" of IPv6 is not "settled" yet. That puts thedeployment of IPv6 in the category of "experiment" and not "production".And, of course, we now have companies like T-Mobile and othersturning IPv4 off. If that's an experiment, wow.The cellular data industry appears to have embraced IPv6 in one form or
another. I would expect that the network engineers have done some work
to keep IPv4 off their *internal* networks, but provide IPv4 access at
the edge. (Isn't a netblock within IPv6 intended to enable bridging to
IPv4?) The applications on the phon could be configured to search DNS
for AAAA addresses first.
My AT&T cell phone has both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. The IPv4 address
is from my access point; the IPv6 address appears to be a public address.
I would like to move to IPv6. I just don't want to shoot myself in the
foot, or cause trouble for other people, by being sure my edge router
"follows all the rules."