On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, ______________ wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Mike (meuon) Harrison wrote:
In the middle of all of this talk re: Cogent and such, they apparantly spent some $$$ somewhere and made our test connection a whole lot better.
This is "better"?
3 so-1-0-0.mp2.NewYork1.Level3.net (212.187.128.153) 73.894 ms 73.798 ms 73.850 ms 4 gigabitethernet5-2.core1.NewYork1.Level3.net (64.159.17.165) 74.199 ms 75.522 ms 74.397 ms 5 204.6.134.162 (204.6.134.162) 962.177 ms 959.560 ms 960.519 ms 6 p5-0.br01.jfk01.atlas.psi.net (154.54.1.197) 3806.177 ms 3814.665 ms 3836.955 ms 7 p14-0.core01.jfk01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.1.21) 3830.980 ms 3813.222 ms 3811.389 ms 8 p13-0.core02.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.121) 3770.229 ms 3815.093 ms 3839.036 ms 9 p14-0.core01.phl01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.2) 3814.309 ms 3823.906 ms 3846.192 ms 10 g0-2.na21.b003003-3.phl01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.250.13.190) 3847.378 ms 3833.999 ms 3817.632 ms 11 Covista.demarc.cogentco.com (66.28.30.50) 3778.689 ms 3782.988 ms 3820.756 ms 12 66.18.32.130 (66.18.32.130) 3832.508 ms 3835.835 ms 3851.331 ms 13 66.28.38.150 (66.28.38.150) 3856.752 ms 3853.476 ms 3856.500 ms
It has sure failed under load today. Killing it.. 'Nuff said. Lots of similiar traces on the MTR (matts traceroute) from the system as well. the resulting tests from today are crudely presented at: http://speedy.higherbandwidth.net/resultsall.cgi Click on the IP address to see the trace.. An amazing link is: http://speedy.higherbandwidth.net/results2.cgi?ip=209.244.4.106 Sure.. the web test is not perfect.. but that is a LOT of variety in results. Like this one: http://speedy.higherbandwidth.net/results2.cgi?ip=12.170.34.5 Thanks folks..