On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Nigel Clarke wrote:
Start now, do whatever it takes.
Amongst the paperwork passed to congress, RIAA must have indicated where it's hackers would work from. Why not start there?
NANOG should not sit on this.
Trust me, if RIAA tried to function without email and internet access for a day or two I think they would get the message.
Surprisingly enough, they didn't seem to care too much that their website was offline fora few days. You never can tell though.
<Nigel>
-----Original Message----- From: Richard A Steenbergen [mailto:ras@e-gerbil.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 6:30 PM To: Nigel Clarke Cc: Jerry Eyers; nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs?
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 09:08:03PM -0700, Nigel Clarke wrote:
Why don't larger ISPs follow through on this? Simply deny RIAA any access...
And what IPs precisely are you planning to deny? So far its all idle threats, we have no idea where they plan to launch their scans or hacking attempts from, or even if they have any clue how to hack anything. I highly doubt they'll be attaching riaa.com to it either.
I suppose if you want symbolism, you can host -l riaa.com and wack their wcom webserver and other stuff at att, but I'd harly call that productive.
-- Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)