On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Gordon Cook wrote:
I am sorry Christian but if you cared enough to read the message to which you are posting you would see that I am not taking part in this conversation
My mistake... Gordon did not write the statement below. I apologize to Gordon for making the statement. but in any case, this is peering issues... not a death issue
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Fletcher E Kittredge wrote:
Golly Paul, I would not have guessed you would have taken this position.
If a tobacco company marks a collusion document "CONFIDENTIAL", should the press not report it?
If a Waco report is market "Top Secret", should the press not report it?
If Boeing has a flawed design, should the press not report it?
There is a fair amount of evidence that an unruly and discourteous press is a profound good for society....
I am sorry gordon, i have a hard time seeing how something killing people is the same as peering.
Christian
**************************************************************** The COOK Report on Internet Index to 8 years of the COOK Report 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA http://cookreport.com (609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) Battle for Cyberspace: How cook@cookreport.com Crucial Technical . . . - 392 pages just published. See http://cookreport.com/ipbattle.shtml ****************************************************************