Which version of Exchange are you talking about, and can you share what about it doesn't support IPv6? Frank -----Original Message----- From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:ryan.finnesey@HarrierInvestments.com] Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 10:56 PM To: Doug Barton; Tim Franklin Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: best practices for management nets in IPv6 We keep running into problem with our IPv6 roll out. I just confirmed today that Exchange does not fully support IPv6 Cheers Ryan -----Original Message----- From: Doug Barton [mailto:dougb@dougbarton.us] Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 4:59 PM To: Tim Franklin Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 On 07/18/2011 06:12, Tim Franklin wrote:
You can also use IPv6 privacy extensions (by default on Windows 7), see rfc4941. For Linux, you can also enable it, which is not a default.
In the context of "addresses I'm using to manage kit", having devices randomly renumber themselves at regular intervals does *not* sound like it's going to make my life easy :(
In IPv4 most people use static assignments for servers, and often use dynamic assignments for client hosts (e.g., DHCP). The IPv6 world is not different. If you don't want privacy addresses for your servers (and it's unlikely that you would) you just make sure that they are not enabled. -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ _____ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog _____ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog