6 Aug
2009
6 Aug
'09
11:07 a.m.
On 8/5/09 7:05 PM, Naveen Nathan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 09:17:01PM -0400, John R. Levine wrote:
...
It seems to me that the situation is no worse than DNSSEC, since in both cases the software at each hop needs to be aware of the security stuff, or you fall back to plain unsigned DNS.
I might misunderstand how dnscurve works, but it appears that dnscurve is far easier to deploy and get running. The issue is merely coverage.
There might be issues related to intellectual property use. :^( -Doug