28 Aug
2010
28 Aug
'10
7:09 a.m.
On 08/28/2010 11:39 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2010-08-28 18:20 +0900), Randy Bush wrote:
a bgp regression suite would not have caught this as it was not a repeat. but it sure would be useful to implementors.
Naturally 'proving' that non-trivial software works is practically impossible. But stating what non-existing test-suite would or would not have covered is not a topic I'm particularly interested to engage.
I suggest the test-tool has 2 bgp-sessions and tests if what it put in did or did not come out on the otherside and in what shape or form. There are already atleast 2 projects which have BGP-code which could probably be adapted: http://code.google.com/p/exabgp/ http://code.google.com/p/bgpsimple/ Can I suggest a fuzzer as wel ?