-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 <m3aawg technical committee co-chair hat> I agree with Suresh here -- NANOG used to almost be somewhat hostile to anyone who started discussions regarding anti-abuse and/or security issues which didn't involve routing backbone engineers. A lot of us old-timers took the hint and basically started lurking, not participating in meetings, or simply checked out of NANOG altogether . A lot of time has passed since those days, so perhaps attitudes have changed a bit with regards to operational anti-abuse issues? - - ferg </m3aawg technical committee co-chair hat> On 7/29/2015 10:14 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
<delurk>
They come to M3AAWG on a regular basis and there’s the M3AAWG hosting SIG that you might want to participate in.
NANOG doesn’t always have a mail abuse (and not very many network abuse) session on the agenda, plus just how many people doing routing or DNS seem to even care what their colleagues down the hall in the abuse team are doing or which conferences they attend?
I remember a time (under the previous list management) when discussing spam here was deemed OT and non operational - off list warnings, suspensions and such. Ancient history I guess, but still ..
</delurk>
—srs
On 29-Jul-2015, at 10:06 AM, Bob Evans <bob@FiberInternetCenter.com> wrote:
Would be nice to have an RBL service that attended NANOG meetings. Would make for a more trusted RBL we can tell customers to make use. Spamhaus ever attend a NANOG meetings ? Thank You Bob Evans CTO
- -- Paul Ferguson PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2 Key fingerprint: 19EC 2945 FEE8 D6C8 58A1 CE53 2896 AC75 54DC 85B2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREIAAYFAlW5DBsACgkQKJasdVTchbIznQD/ac/bMc2uzpkqgFNlMpP9V8Qk yJylbEqt3Nzxt2qFF7ABALwN56oZzdgL4iFFDVh6lHUjJSgcltu9xZIvEv8qbg3c =M2x5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----