5 Mar
2006
5 Mar
'06
4:12 a.m.
On 4 mar 2006, at 17.43, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:59:18 +0100 Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se> wrote:
On 3 mar 2006, at 04.13, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
I would be surprised if Shim6 going into actual deployed boxes was any faster. So, if Shim6 was finalized today, which it won't be, in 2010 we might have 70% deployment and in 2012 we might have 90% deployment.
OTOH Teredo, which isn't even a standard is in more or less all Windows XP boxes....
Teredo is described in RFC 4380; it's a Proposed Standard.
Duh. Given I was part of the discussion of which prefixes to use in the document I should have remembered that... Still it was deployed way before that. - kurtis -