On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> wrote:
The vast majority of residential customers have a single subnet, so they can get by just fine using IPv6 link-local addresses. The vanishingly small percentage that have multiple subnets are presumably savvy enough to set up ULA-R addresses. There is no need for ULA-C in this scenario.
Actually it's pretty common for residential customers to have multiple subnets, one wired and one wireless, even if they're both NAT'd to 192.168.x.x. They may may or not be doing anything with the wired subnet, and their wireless router may also be providing a wired subnet bridged with the wireless, and it's all happening in little consumer-appliance boxes that work by magic, but it's out there. -- ---- Thanks; Bill Note that this isn't my regular email account - It's still experimental so far. And Google probably logs and indexes everything you send it.