You certainly would, except for the fact that the provider is in bankruptcy and won't/can't answer the phone. We wanted to do an oc3 or oc12 or gig-e, but that was replied to with, "wha?" On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Brian wrote:
bwahaha, 2 funnee. I gotta think most people would be thinking of adding another ds3 at that point.
Bri
----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Rosenthal" <pr@isprime.com> To: "'Alex Rubenstein'" <alex@nac.net> Cc: <nanog@merit.edu> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 6:05 PM Subject: RE: PSINet/Cogent Latency
40mb/s isn't "loaded" for a DS3?
--Phil
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Alex Rubenstein Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 8:27 PM To: Derek Samford Cc: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency
Yes, it's horrid. I've been peering with PSI for going on three years, and it's never been as bad as it is now.
oddly enough, we see 30+ msec across a DS3 to them, which isn't that loaded (35 to 40 mb/s).
Then, behind whatever we peer with, we see over 400 msec, with 50% loss, during business hours.
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Derek Samford wrote:
There was some mail being tossed around earlier about Cogent
having
latency. I'm actually seeing this on PSINet (Now owned by Cogent.) Is anyone else still seeing the latency they were experiencing earlier?
Derek
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex@nac.net, latency, Al Reuben -- -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex@nac.net, latency, Al Reuben -- -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --