There's a github repo with configuration examples from a number of vendors

https://github.com/TCP-AO


As for usage....slow adoption.  I only know of one production deployment
(because I control both eBGP routers :)

https://labs.ripe.net/author/andrew-gallo/production-deployment-of-tcp-authentication-option/


(maybe Cunningham's law will apply and someone will prove me wrong)



On 6/12/2024 7:00 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> I don't think that URL explains how commonly it is used.
>
> In my experience TCP-AO use is extremely limited, partly because it's
> super new in practice. Juniper had it for a long time, but it was
> pre-standard even years after the standard was published, which
> probably didn't matter much, as no one else had it at all until
> somewhat recently.
>
> I suspect this type of order of events may have led many people to
> look into TCP-AO early on, and decided correctly it was not
> operationally feasible, and that has stuck.
>
>
>
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 13:57, Marco Paesani <marco@paesani.it> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> you can start from here:
>> https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/transport-ip/topics/topic-map/tcp-configure-ao-bgp-ldp.html
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> -----
>>
>> Marco Paesani
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Skype: mpaesani
>> Mobile: +39 348 6019349
>> Success depends on the right choice !
>> Email: marco@paesani.it
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Il giorno mer 12 giu 2024 alle ore 12:52 7riw77@gmail.com <7riw77@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>> Y'all --
>>>
>>> Does anyone know of a survey or study showing the rate of uptake for BGP over TCP-AO? I've poked around some and asked in a few places and not found anything, but I probably missed something out there.
>>>
>>> If there's no studies, does anyone have any experiences possibly indicating BGP over TCP-AO usage they can share?
>>>
>>> :-) /r
>
>