31 Mar
2003
31 Mar
'03
7:38 p.m.
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
Since a common carrier can't filter on content -- only fraudulent and malicious activity against the carrier itself -- there's not much (legal) purpose in maintaining an abuse@ alias.
Of course these are the same tier1s who whinge when people nullroute them... -Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]