4 Apr
2000
4 Apr
'00
6:59 p.m.
On Tue, Apr 04, 2000, John Payne wrote:
On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 12:15:24AM -0400, Gordon Cook wrote:
else. My default mode of operation has always been to keep the identity of the leaker CONFIDENTIAL. It is a subject of interest to
So publishing the leaked note verbatim doesn't strike you as possibly disclosing the identity of the leaker to the company that had it leaked?
It seems to me that it would be trivia for exodus or any other company to insert uniquely identifying phrases or misspellings, or whatever...
Its the leaker's risk. Adrian