of course, my company is working on two main tasks:<br>the first team is focused on discovering what is the virus, and what is the best anti-virus.<br>instead, my team has already scaled our DNS service, by doubling the number of DNSs.
<br><br>I'm not completely satisfied by the &quot;scaling solution&quot;: I wish to find a solution that could grant a good quality of the service without placing a lot of DNS in my web-farms<br><br>Thanks<br>Best Regards
<br><br>Luke<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/8/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Matt Ghali</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:matt@snark.net">matt@snark.net</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Simon Waters wrote:<br><br>&gt; I suspect complex rate limiting may be nearly as expensive as providing DNS<br>&gt; answers with Bind9.<br><br>Indeed. It is generally accepted that it is easier to simply scale
<br>your service to provide adequate headroom than implement per-client<br>traffic policies.<br><br>of course, you could also work on cleaning up the mess, but I will<br>charitably assume you are working the problem from both directions
<br>simultaneously.<br><br>matto<br><br>--matt@snark.net------------------------------------------&lt;darwin&gt;&lt;<br>&nbsp;&nbsp; Moral indignation is a technique to endow the idiot with dignity.<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; - Marshall McLuhan
<br></blockquote></div><br>