As a Holder of two different FCC licenses I can tell you voltage is not what kills, it is amps and location that kill. Actually in certain cases as long at you have good electrical isolation, high enough dielectric breakdown voltage, and good grounding higher voltages can be safer and more efficient. Also, Thomas Edison was the one that discovered that trying to deliver DC more than a few feet was not a good idea. -- ----------------- Brian Raaen Network Engineer email: /braaen@zcorum.com/ <mailto:braaen@zcorum.com> FCC GROL (General Radiotelephone Operators License) FCC Amateur Extra Class KG4CXN (Also certified volunteer examiner with CAVAC and ARRL) Alex H. Ryu wrote:
Also, adding followings.
5) availability from local power provider(s)
6) local regulation such as fire department safety rules...
7) for your own safety... (120V may not kill people, but 240V can do...)
If you want better, why not just have everything to DC power ? Something like 48V...
Alex
Wayne E. Bouchard wrote:
1) Equipment used to not be dual voltage
2) For smaller scale, 120V UPS and distribution equipment is usually cheaper
3) 120V embedded itself into operations as a result.
4) We're all lazy and hate change.
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:39:10PM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
I have a pure curiosity question for the NANOG crowd here. If you run your facility/datacenter/cage/rack on 120 volts, why?
I've been running my facility at 208 for years because I can get away with lower amperage circuits. I'm curious about the reasons for using high-amp 120 volt circuits to drive racks of equipment instead of low-amp 208 or 240 volt circuits.
~Seth
--- Wayne Bouchard web@typo.org Network Dude http://www.typo.org/~web/