12 Nov
2012
12 Nov
'12
1:40 a.m.
On 11/12/12 1:21 AM, Kasper Adel wrote:
Is it because C5 softswitches have expensive hardware, advanced software and dual asics? I would have never imagined that any vendor is capable of upgrading fpd's/ASICs ucode without a hit unless there are multiple chips continuously syncing with each other.
And they only have to process maybe 2mbit/s of control traffic during busy hour. The rest is handled by dedicated hardware/ASIC's. Each one has a fully redundant hardware circuit pack and a bunch of monitoring to switch over in case one fails. Even then, it's fun when some one screws up and reboots it :) -- Bryan Fields 727-409-1194 - Voice 727-214-2508 - Fax http://bryanfields.net