Actually he reported that he did ask you for information and his take on the information was that it made no sense, hence he asked us...IMHO that's a reasonable thing to do. To me it looks like your trying to spin the event now, this post has a quite different tone and information than the first you made here. It makes it hard to take you seriously...but it was hard to take the whole thing seriously from the first post...it still makes no sense that you won't guarantee routing for him unless he makes you his primary provider. It sounds like you're just trying to tie him up.
He did not deny routing, he denied the availability of providing full routes. There's a difference. If he's getting a connection from Sprintlink, he can only accept the routes that he wants, and can then default through fONOROLA, and thereby load balance. I don't think that looks anything like denial of service. It may not be the preferred method, but it certainly doesn't make them unusable. Dave -- Dave Siegel President, RTD Systems & Networking, Inc. (520)623-9663 Systems Consultant -- Unix, LANs, WANs, Cisco dsiegel@rtd.com User Tracking & Acctg -- "Written by an ISP, http://www.rtd.com/ for an ISP."