7 Feb
2007
7 Feb
'07
2:45 p.m.
On Feb 7, 2007, at 6:27 AM, Jeff Kell wrote:
Alexander Harrowell wrote:
It was clear from the highly reliable index I call the "Nanogdex" that nothing was seriously amiss.
Yes, but it got so much bloody press that ambitious copycats can't be too far behind.
When 2 of 13 root systems are affected (>90% loss), how many systems will withstand such an attack when targeted lower within the hierarchy? FWIW, the attack rates did not seem that high. -Doug