You could possibly look at rolling vMX (if it's even available yet) on x86 hardware. It's licensed by throughput and feature set. If you are doing L3VPN, I think you would need the advanced license. This may fit within your budget. On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Tim Raphael <raphael.timothy@gmail.com> wrote:
You’ll be looking at a Juniper MX or a Cisco ASK9K I think.
The MXs are targeted as being full-features edge routers. An MX5 will take a full feed just fine and do all the *VPN you want. If you’re talking about multiple full feeds then you’ll need a MX240 with one of the higher-power REs for a decent reconvergence time.
On 9 Apr 2015, at 10:42 pm, Daniel Rohan <drohan@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Tim Raphael <raphael.timothy@gmail.com <mailto:raphael.timothy@gmail.com>> wrote: L3VPN hand off is the only thing I can think of from the top of my head. But then, there would be no need to have a full table unless you had customers requesting a full table.
I have one customer who needs an L3VPN for some shared private routes along with a full table in inet.0. There are ways of accomplishing this creatively but I'm looking for devices that can handle these types of requests that permit us some level of sanity.