12 Nov
2004
12 Nov
'04
6:10 a.m.
On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 10:58 +0000, Michael.Dillon@radianz.com wrote:
Regardless of the merit of NAT, there is little merit in IPv6+NAT as it has all the downsides of both. If you can live with NAT, stay in IPv4 and talk to the IPv6 world over IPv4<->IPv6 NAT.
Or upgrade to NAP (Network Architecture Protection) *grin*
That is actually exactly what should be told to any administrator that asks for "IPv6 NAT": "No, in IPv6 it is done differently, it is then called NAP, which is waaay cooler and saves you a lot of money and troubles". Greets, Jeroen