9 Sep
1996
9 Sep
'96
7:26 a.m.
Isn't the argument of the non-default routing tables growing by an additional 13 entries or not is specious noise? The routing bucket is leaking through bloody great open chasms and we are wondering about the incremental damage throuigh a pinhole!
The 13 additional entries are not the issue. The issue is one of setting a bad high-profile example. Any suggestions for closing the open chasms in the routing bucket? - Havard