30 Jun
2014
30 Jun
'14
9:05 a.m.
On Jun 30, 2014, at 7:42 PM, Simon Perreault <simon@per.reau.lt> wrote:
Why? Cause that (per-subscriber limits on ports and memory) is exactly what we recommend in RFC 6888...
<https://app.box.com/s/a3oqqlgwe15j8svojvzl> I can't tell you how many times I've received frantic 4AM calls about NATted wireless networks going down due to this sort of thing. It's a real problem. Also, there are horizontal behaviors which are undesirable, as well. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Equo ne credite, Teucri. -- Laocoön