That may be a little extreme ... I generally get good support from all of my upstreams. However, there's a certain amount of static to be expected when you start raising inter-provider issues, especially when all the latency seems be caused by the provider you aren't a customer of. -travis On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Tom Thomas wrote:
Bad attitudes to a customer are a clear indication you should take your money elsewhere.
Personally I like NetRail, they are courteous and responsive.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of Travis Pugh Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 1:13 PM To: nanog@merit.edu Subject: UUNet / ATT peering meltdown?
Not to open up any potential disputes, but has anyone heard what is going on between UUNet and AT&T on the east coast? We've been seeing this kind of performance for a week ... standard UUNet NOC response was "it's ATT's problem, call them" which doesn't do me a whole lot of good since we're not an ATT customer.
UUNet --> ATT
6 POS6-0.BR3.NYC9.ALTER.NET (152.63.24.97) 9.212 ms 9.633 ms 10.363 ms 7 137.39.52.74 (137.39.52.74) 9.642 ms 12.967 ms 12.137 ms 8 gbr3-p50.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.123.1.122) 418.555 ms 416.419 ms 419.819 ms
ATT --> UUNet
8 ggr1-p370.attga.ip.att.net (12.123.20.253) [AS 7018] 20 msec 24 msec 20 msec 9 att-gw.atl.uu.net (192.205.32.130) [AS 7018] 396 msec 396 msec 392 msec 10 179.at-6-0-0.XR1.ATL5.ALTER.NET (152.63.82.190) [AS 701] 388 msec 388 msec 388 msec
Thanks.
-travis