Not to derail this highly relevant thread, and forgive my ignorance, but what's the issue with IPv6 multihoming? On Sun, Feb 17, 2019, 10:01 PM Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com wrote:
... and of all those, once you solve v6 multihoming (possibly with ipv9) do come back to nanog where I'm sure it will be operational.
On 18/02/19, 8:23 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Michel Py" < nanog-bounces@nanog.org on behalf of michel.py@tsisemi.com> wrote:
> Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan wrote : > I solved the email spam problem.
Oh, this is wonderful news. There are plenty of other problems that need your brilliance. In no specific order :
- Global warming. - Nuclear proliferation. - Peace in the middle east. - World hunger. - IPv6 multihoming.
We will be looking for your next improvement.
TSI Disclaimer: This message and any files or text attached to it are intended only for the recipients named above and contain information that may be confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not forward, copy, use or otherwise disclose this communication or the information contained herein. In the event you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, and then delete all copies of it from your system. Thank you!...