On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 2:35 PM Sabri Berisha <sabri@cluecentral.net> wrote:
----- On Aug 30, 2021, at 6:29 AM, Rubens Kuhl rubensk@gmail.com wrote:
And that's why carpet bombing those IP blocks might be needed so the next
entity that ends up with those IP addresses long after CI has gone into oblivion will have its engineers debug odd routing issues for years. We all know that people regularly fail to update their manually entered filters on at least a few of their routers.
We already have IP blocks with so much "background radiation" that RIRs prefer not allocating them, or only allocating them to people with distributed traffic handling capacity, like 1.1.1.x. But the less of those there are, the better.
The learned people on this list do not strike me as the kind of person to go out and engage in vigilante justice if a court decides against them. The very fabric of our civilized society depends on us resolving our conflicts in court, not out on the (virtual) streets. You may disagree with a ruling but I implore you to respect it.
As previously mentioned, this is about something that doesn't involve a court ruling, at least not yet, but a seizure request made by the party to attack the sustainability of the RIR. Rulings that people disagree have their own way inside the court system to be dealt with. Rubens