On 10/Jun/20 20:29, Tim Durack wrote:
I would take either LDPv6 or SRv6 - but also need L3VPN (and now EVPN) re-wired to use IPv6 NH.
At the moment, LDPv6 doesn't have what I call "service" support, i.e., l3vpn's, l2vpn's, MPLSv6-TE, mLDP, CsC, e.t.c. To be honest, I don't mind those so much on my end because you can still run a BGP-free core and still deliver those services. Granted, if your goal is a single-stack MPLS-based IPv6 network, then yes, it would be good for LDPv6 to support the "services". But if it's just vanilla MPLSv6 switching you're after, then LDPv6 will do just fine.
I have requested LDPv6 and SRv6 many times from Cisco to migrate the routing control plane from IPv4 to IPv6
Well, according to them, SRv6 is winning customers over, and nobody wants LDPv6. Then again, they have LDPv6 in IOS XR; figures.
I have lots of IPv6 address space. I don't have a lot of IPv4 address space. RFC1918 is not as big as it seems. Apparently this is hard to grasp...
(This is primarily IOS-XE - can't afford the IOS-XR supercars)
LDPv6 must be a business case :-). Well, wonder how they sell so many CGN's, then :-). Mark.