I agree with previous poster, table size progression and corresponding increase in search delay, probably related directly to the monitoring itself, or at least a connection state of some kind. On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Jake Khuon <khuon@neebu.net> wrote:
On 31/05/13 17:30, Brett Frankenberger wrote:
How can you possibly have consistent increase in latency like
that? I'd love to hear theories (or offers of beer, your choice!).
Variation of the buffer filling theory is that there's some QoS/traffic-shaping going on which is causing your ping packets to get classed and policed into an ever depleting buffer pool.
I wonder what would happen to the pattern if you reset the interface. |8^)
-- /*=================[ Jake Khuon <khuon@NEEBU.Net> ]=================+ | Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | -------- | | for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation / |/ [_ [_ |) |_| NETWORKS | +=============================**==============================**=======*/