15 Aug
2002
15 Aug
'02
9:27 p.m.
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Niels Bakker wrote:
But instead you prefer a "lazy" NOC, where you need manual intervention in case you screw up a filter list on your end to re-enable the BGP session? No, instead I prefer to do all route filtering on my (cust) side, and have the ISP do filtering based on AS PATH, be it ^CUST-AS_ or configured off the RADB......
(Well, if a customer is accidentally leaking a full table then ^CUST-AS_ will still match everything they send you...)
True, but my point is that if ISP is doing filtering based on ^CUST-AS_ they should be implementing _some_ sort of protection against full table leaks. Regards, Joe