31 Jan
2002
31 Jan
'02
10:05 a.m.
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Martin J. Levy wrote:
I got this forwarded to me. I'm not impressed.
Based upon the general desire for providers to have NAT'ed users and to reduce IP-space usage where appropriate, does this make sense? I can understand the providers desire to increase revenue, but I don't believe this is a good way to do it.
Slashdot, the tabloid of the tech world. I believe if you read through all the comments no one ever came up with any proof of this and reading through Commcast's AUP doesn't reveal this policy either. I think it was largely trollbait. andy -- PGP Key Available at http://www.tigerteam.net/andy/pgp