In message <BANLkTi=i6nSSvj-ah2nbWpiZ_jYhLc3Lsg@mail.gmail.com>, Cameron Byrne writes:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick@ianai.net> wro= te:
On May 24, 2011, at 12:02 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
I don't think they have to hijack space from DoD. I think there are a number of other options available to them. They might cost more, but, they also come with somewhat lower risks
the good thing is 7 exists on networks that will never see the light of day... so it's just like 10! only lower and cooler! (and lucky, if you believe the movies and all)
It's not just whether those networks will ever leak 7. =A0It's whether th= e DoD will ever announce anything in 7.
If they do, any Rogers customer who wants to talk to it is screwed. =A0Wh= ether they have a 7 addy or not, Rogers' routers will not let the packet le= ave Rogers' borders.
Now, the onus is on the DoD to make its content available over unique IPv6 space so that the Roger's customers can get to it using the 6to4-PMT solution. There is always a solution.
There is also the option of having customers that need 6to4, etc. just register on the web site like customers that need port 25/TCP open register with many ISPs. Those customers then get addresses from different pools for which 6to4 works.
Cameron
-- TTFN, patrick
-- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org